Election Candidate Surveys

Candidates for Victoria / CTH Senate Election 2013


Show

All Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Q10

Scoring Key


Yes, Definitely10Probably7Unsure5Unlikely3Definitely Not2No Comment1

Candidate scores

BG = Ballot Group / BP = Ballot Position / = previously sitting member / = personal response / = party response
BG BP Candidate Party Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Q10 Total
A1NALLIAH, DanielRise Up Australia Party10101010101010101010100
A2CRESTANI, RosalieRise Up Australia Party10101010101010101010100
AA1ASSANGE, JulianThe Wikileaks Party----------0
AA2CANNOLD, LeslieThe Wikileaks Party----------0
AA3KAMPMARK, BinoyThe Wikileaks Party----------0
AB1COLLYER, DavidAustralian Democrats111111111110
AB2HOWE, RogerAustralian Democrats111111111110
AB3ISGRO, SarinaAustralian Democrats111111111110
AB4RAINES, GregAustralian Democrats111111111110
AB5LIVESAY, RobertAustralian Democrats111111111110
AB6GRUMMET, RichardAustralian Democrats111111111110
AC1PATTEN, FionaSex Party----------0
AC2HOPKINS, AngeSex Party----------0
AD1MARSHALL, GavinAustralian Labor Party1033227225339
AD2COLLINS, JacintaAustralian Labor Party1033227225339
AD3TILLEM, MehmetAustralian Labor Party1033227225339
AD4PSAILA, LynnAustralian Labor Party1033227225339
AD5LARKINS, TerryAustralian Labor Party1033227225339
AD6MILETO, JamieAustralian Labor Party1033227225339
AE1CHRISTIE, SimonOutdoor Recreation Party (Stop the Greens)----------0
AE2DESTRY, TerryOutdoor Recreation Party (Stop the Greens)----------0
AF1CHIPP, GregDrug Law Reform----------0
AF2SHERMAN, JohnDrug Law Reform----------0
AG1ERWOOD, MarkBullet Train for Australia----------0
AG2PHILLIPS, SteveBullet Train for Australia----------0
AH1JANSON, VickieAustralian Christians10101010101010101010100
AH2PAPAFOTIOU, FrankAustralian Christians10101010101010101010100
AI1ISHERWOOD, CraigCitizens Electoral Council----------0
AI2BARWICK, RobertCitizens Electoral Council----------0
AJ1NICHOLLS, Bobnone5535310335749
AJ2NICHOLLS, Kylienone----------0
AJ3WEBB, Peternone----------0
AK1O'CONNOR, PatrickSocialist Equality Party111111111110
AK2BAPTIST, TaniaSocialist Equality Party111111111110
AL1MILES, JosephPirate Party----------0
AL2HAMMETT, Geoffrey DavidPirate Party----------0
AM1FARRELL, MarkDemocratic Labour Party10101010101010101010100
AM2MAZZARELLA, StephanieDemocratic Labour Party10101010101010101010100
B1WHELAN, Peter WilliamLiberal Democrats1021032210521056
B2WILMS, TimLiberal Democrats1021032210521056
C1TOWNSEND, Dale PhillipOne Nation----------0
C2TOWNSEND, Rosalyn LeeOne Nation----------0
D1TAYLOR, LloydSenator Online (Internet Voting Bills/Issues)111111111110
D2SMITH, TonySenator Online (Internet Voting Bills/Issues)111111111110
E1FIFIELD, MitchLiberal Party10527257251055
E2RYAN, ScottLiberal Party10527257251055
E3KROGER, HELENLiberal Party10527257251055
E4CORBOY, Martin LouisThe Nationals10527257251055
F1RILEY, MattHelp End Marijuana Prohibition (HEMP) Party----------0
F2FLETCHER, Ryan WilliamHelp End Marijuana Prohibition (HEMP) Party----------0
G1FENN, AshleyFamily First10101010101010101010100
G2MORRIS, TrudieFamily First10101010101010101010100
H1JONES, AndrewCountry Alliance77105510171760
H2KERR, GarryCountry Alliance----------0
I1PERKINS, John LSecular Party of Australia111111111110
I2SCEATS, Rosemary ElizabethSecular Party of Australia111111111110
J1DAWSON, ChrisNo Carbon Tax Climate Sceptics10101010101010101010100
J2RODDA, JohnNo Carbon Tax Climate Sceptics----------0
K1RIGONI, Maria MarciaBank Reform Party111111111110
K2RIGONI, PaulBank Reform Party----------0
L1HAYES, CliffordStable Population Party----------0
L2QUIRK, JillStable Population Party----------0
M1SALT, AbeSmokers Rights----------0
M2BEREGSZASZI, JanosSmokers Rights----------0
N1ZAMMIT, JoeAustralian Fishing and Lifestyle Party----------0
N2ABELA, RichardAustralian Fishing and Lifestyle Party----------0
O1MALONEY, TerryShooters and Fishers----------0
O2MALCOLM, SteveShooters and Fishers----------0
P1EVANS, DarrenBuilding Australia----------0
P2WHITE, SamuelBuilding Australia----------0
Q1SHMUEL, ImmanuelAustralian Voice Party111111111110
Q2HUGHES, VernAustralian Voice Party111111111110
R1SHAW, SamanthaAustralian Independents----------0
R2WOOD, YvonneAustralian Independents----------0
S1RICE, JanetThe Greens221227122223
S2MCCARTHY, Trent MarkThe Greens221227122223
S3TRUONG, Thi Viet HuongThe Greens221227122223
S4CHRISTOE, Ian JThe Greens221227122223
S5SEKHON, GurmThe Greens221227122223
S6HUMPHREYS, RobertThe Greens221227122223
T1TOSCANO, Josephnone111111111110
T2MATTHEWS, Bethnone----------0
U1THORROWGOOD, Roger HughStop CSG----------0
U2VAN ROSMALEN, AdeleStop CSG----------0
UG1GUNTER, LynIndependent111111111110
UG2MORRISON, Darrell ScottIndependent----------0
V1DANIELI, RobertKatter's Australian Party105101010101010101095
V2COSTABILE, DavidKatter's Australian Party105101010101010101095
W1MICHAEL, BarryPalmer United Party111111111110
W2HAWKINS, Douglas JamesPalmer United Party111111111110
W3PALMAN, Penny MareePalmer United Party111111111110
X1CONSANDINE, PeterThe Australian Republicans----------0
X2PORTORS, ClintonThe Australian Republicans----------0
Y1POON, BruceAnimal Justice Party225537373744
Y2DAVISON, SarahAnimal Justice Party----------0
Z1MUIR, RickyAustralian Motoring Enthusiast Party----------0
Z2GILL, Craig AAustralian Motoring Enthusiast Party----------0

Questionnaire


Prayers in parliament are an important daily reminder that we must all ultimately answer to the higher authority of Almighty God. The prayers, which consist of the Lord's Prayer and a request for God's guidance, are an expression of the Christian foundation of our nation. According to the latest census, about 61% of Australians identify with Christianity.

Would you vote to support the continued opening of parliament with Christian prayers?

In 2004 the Marriage Act 1961 was amended to reaffirm the understanding across cultures throughout history, that marriage is the union of a man and a woman. The purpose of marriage is to ensure that wherever possible, children are raised with both mum and dad role models in a stable environment – shown by research to be the safest family type.

Would you vote to retain the Marriage Act 1961 definition of marriage as “the union of a man and a woman, to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life”?

Paid parental leave and baby bonus laws have allowed women whose babies are delivered stillborn after 20 weeks gestation to receive the payments (on average about $9000 paid leave or $5200 baby bonus), even though there is no live baby to care for. A form obtained from the SA government’s Pregnancy Advisory Centre (abortion clinic) in 2013 advises women who have had abortions after 20 weeks on how to access these payments.

Would you vote to amend the paid parental leave laws in order to abolish access to these payments by women who undergo a late abortion?

Harm minimisation has been one of the key principles of Australia’s drug strategy since 1985. Harm minimisation measures include needle and syringe exchanges, injecting rooms, heroin prescription, methadone substitution, liberal cannabis laws and drug testing kits. This strategy has largely failed. By contrast, Sweden has shown that “drug free” policies can dramatically reduce the use of illicit drugs.

Would you support changing the “harm minimisation” focus of the current national drug policy to “harm prevention”, and treatment with a drug-free goal?

The current classification system for publications, films and videos bans (i.e. refuses classification for) dangerous material including child pornography, and material promoting crime, suicide or terrorism. Unfiltered, the internet can bring explicit pornography and material that promotes terrorism, crime or suicide into the family home – and to children outside the home via mobile phones. Voluntary computer-based filters do not protect children in vulnerable situations. Mandatory filtering at the ISP level is essential to protect children and maintain a healthy society.

Would you support mandatory filtering of the internet at ISP level to exclude all material currently refused classification in print, film or video media?

Sports betting is a greatly increasing form of gambling in Australia. A 2012 survey of 4,680 adults who have gambled online found that 88.9% used the internet to bet on races or sports. Promoting live odds during sports broadcasts on all media places viewers, especially children, at risk of gambling addiction and serious financial loss.

Would you vote to prohibit all forms of gambling promotion during radio, TV and online sports broadcasts?

The national curriculum currently being introduced in schools throughout Australia has been criticised for – among other things – being too detailed and inflexible, sidelining great texts of English literature, a flawed approach to teaching reading and a biased approach to history that marginalises Christianity.

Would you support a rewrite of the national curriculum to give states greater flexibility and to cover the key role Judeo-Christian values and the Bible have played in our culture and democracy?

Surveys indicate that a large majority of parents would prefer one parent (usually the mother) to care for their children full-time at home if they could afford it. Current child care benefits are much more generous to mothers who place their children in child care centres than to those who care for their own children at home. All parents should be treated equally, receiving the same benefits – enabling them to choose whether to spend the money on childcare or on helping one parent stay at home.

Would you support legislation to provide equal benefits to all families with young children, either baby bonus, parental leave or child care, whether the mother is in the workforce or not?

Euthanasia means the intentional killing of a person who is suffering pain or mental distress, instead of providing medical treatment or palliative care. Euthanasia does not mean ending treatment that is futile or burdensome, since treatment can always be declined. Evidence from the Netherlands, Oregon and the Northern Territory shows that legalised euthanasia has led to the deaths of persons who were not terminally ill, or were suffering treatable depression or did not ask for euthanasia.

Would you vote against any proposal to facilitate Territory bills allowing doctors to intentionally kill their patients?

Laws that prohibit vilification on the grounds of religious belief or sexuality are an unwarranted interference with free speech and religious liberty. Those who point out the health risks of homosexual behaviour or who question claims and practices of a particular religion, such as Islam, should not be penalised. Australians are already adequately protected by sedition laws, which prohibit incitement to use force or violence against others that would threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.

Would you vote against any attempt to introduce a “vilification” law that would penalise frank discussion and debate of religious belief or sexuality?

Joomla SEF URLs by Artio